GBL is good but NOT NoL calibre ...not as high as the AA or FL either
The GBL is a good league. It has its own set of issues with/without the AB franchises just like any other league. Its standards may try to get to that of the NoL and AA but its not there by any real meaningful measure. The FL, by design, is a notch below with it's roster rules and strong central governance (without central ownership) but it too is superior by most measures. The comparison makes this pretty clear.
Player standards: Until the GBL dropped its salary cap it was much lower than the NoL and AA ($105K cap). The FL imposes a limit of 3 veterans (defined as 3+ yrs experience not 5+ in the NoL & AA), 2 LS-2, and 7 LS-1 and no player can be over 27 yr. old ($60K cap). Having Rickie and Jose were great for publicity but better players will follow the money and crowds. It also doesn't help that the GBL's season is 20 games shorter than the other leagues since that also matters to players (longer job, more practice).
Attendance: Edmonton averaged more than ANY GBL club this season (Edmonton: 1,792 - Yuma 1,713); most GBL clubs were behind Calgary (at 1,551). All other NoL clubs drew 2 to nearly 4 times as much as Yuma. With CB and StJ gone only Shreveport (1,359) drew in the GBL range; half of the AA drew approx 2-3 times as much as Yuma. The FL's troubled Slippery Rock and Kalamazoo franchises are the only drawing below the GBL's best; three of which were 2-3 times Yuma.
Ballpark standards: Clearly and provably inferior --especially compared to the current NoL which has "all new" ballparks complete excellent concourse views, 12+ skyboxes and many other amenities. The comparison with the AA is closer, with improvement already in the works (GP, Pensacola) as is the FL (though I'm no expert on that league's facilities).
Again, I don't want to take anything away from the league and its goals, but the reality is not the same as the rhetoric.


