| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
flyerfan92 |
overland park |
Lead | |
|
its a huge stretch, probably shouldn't even be brought up, but other than topeka, overland park seems to be the only chouce for KC, I know its only 13.5
miles away (ft.worth and GP are 20), but with a population of over 180,000, it would seem like a good spot for proffessional baseball, just a thought
|
|||
MJHankel |
|||
|
Is there a stadium?
|
|||
nlfan |
|||
|
The discussions about another ballpark in the KC area were Lee's Summit. That's been on again/off again for about two years with some rumblings
it's a possible FL project. Given the lack of current active discussion (in the press) I assume it's dead. Overland Park might, population-wise, make
sense but there's no ballpark and probably little or no interest.
The problem will (always) remain that if there was a ballpark appropriate for the league, there would be talk about it and/or already a club in it. These days that's all the more true since in that area there's direct competition with the AA (and to a lesser degree the ULB) and as you go east that transitions to the FL. About the only thing that might would be for the AA to leave St. Joe and for the NoL try to take it over. And, as always, any new ballpark in those areas (not adjacent to MLB franchises) also may compete with MiLB. Situations like Wichita are what you need to watch since, sadly, most communities would prefer affiliated ball for its "stature." And like Wichita (or Ottawa, or Edmonton), they're multi-year processes as the new ballpark is built, the franchise prepares to relocate, the community fights to keep them --then loses, then resolves to find a new indy tenant. About the only thing lead to "new news" are groups that are willing to build ballparks whether public or private. The number of "ballpark-only" deals is going down and what you would have to watch for are more "urban renewal" deals where the ballpark is folded into a larger projects (like Pensacola's new ballpark slated for 2010). |
|||
Ray Sipsa |
|||
|
Re most communities preferring MiLB over independent teams: Stature might be involved but these teams are also marketed as displaying "the stars of
tomorrow." Go to almost any affiliated minor league park and the program will list major league players who have, at some previous time, played in the
team or the league. In fact it is almost kind of interesting to go to a MiLB game and purchase a program with a current roster full of nobodies. Then put the
program away and pull it out five or six years later and you are sure to recognize some names that made the show.
The Indy Leagues with which I am familiar, the AA and NoL, seem to offer a higher quality of play than the "Low A" minor league teams, but no direct upward mobility for the players. Indeed a lot of independent league players are rebounding from injuries or trying to work their way back into affiliated ball after being released. But my personal preference is for Indy ball. |
|||
cra218 |
|||
|
if stjoe moves wouldnt kc be a natural replacement and an stj nol team would be just as isolated as kc is now . as for the ubl n fl competing for turf v the
nol i wouldnt worry about those 2 loops
|
|||
nlfan |
|||
cra218 wrote: I've tried to ignore you but as usual, you're either lost, confused, confusing, and just plain wrong. There's little chance that St. Joe would move to the KC since there's no ballpark there to house them now and no new ballparks in the works. No "replacement/move" to date has ever been just "down the road" (Rochester -> Winnipeg, Thunder Bay -> Schaumburg, Madison -> Lincoln, Duluth -> KCK) --unless you want to count the Goldeyes move from Deformity Field to CanWest. If St. Joe were to move (as some rumors suggest) that franchise would end up in/as Grand Prairie. It might be (technically) shelved for future AA expansion (such as Brighton) if GP was "expansion." If the NoL were to expand (or the remote possibility relocate an AB franchise) to St. Joe, KCK would be quite happy (and close). Or are you crazi enough to suggest that St. Joe would replace/become KCK? --which is impossible on so many counts. FL & GLB competition You may not worry, but you're crazi.
The NoL is clearly and obviously in competition with both leagues and that competition is clearly reason for concern (for those who don't live in craziworld). The FL is clearly more significant, but both have direct impacts to any NoL US expansion plans. The FL --and you should obviously know-- has pretty much blocked the NoL out of anything in Michigan, Indiana, So. Ill. and St. Louis. Last year's expansion to Marion --another location the NoL desperately wanted-- is just one example. Their efforts in the Chicago area (McHenry County and Crystal Lake) represent possible locations that the NoL might have wanted --and could be direct competition for the league for fan dollars. It wouldn't be much of a surprise if they tried Milwaukee (Waukesha) and/or any other location left that the NoL left open (and the NWL hasn't taken over). The GLB was the third league courting Wichita. Compared to the AA, they're admittedly not much competition for the NoL and likely to be trounced by the AA (and NoL) in any future head-to-head(-to-head) competitions. But they are the current force behind activities in Topeka --a location recently courted by the NoL-- and, if successful would lock both leagues out. Since they're willing to put up their own money to build ballparks, they have a better chance to succeed than any "retractable roof proposal." |
|||
cra218 |
|||
|
back with the personal attacks again i see mr bill and as for the NoL POSSIBLY going into st joseph you brought that up not i . as for the nol being blocked by
the fl as you say the windy city area clubs kick the behind of the fl clubs in attendance and the fl has not only shut the nol if you will out of eastern
michigan but themselves as well
|
|||
nlfan |
|||
|
You label yourself "crazi." Excuse me for calling what you write "crazi" when that's who you call yourself --and it often comes off as
"crazy." When you write coherently and consistently then any so-called "attacks" will end --as has happen when your post make sense (or
simply aren't worth replying to).
Let's review some of the incomprehensible comments of your last two posts if stjoe moves wouldnt kc be a natural replacementWhat does that sentence (fragment) mean? What/Who in KC naturally replacing St. Joe? Which league? Excuse me if I try to understand any sort of connection between a "stjoe move" and "kc natural replacement" as I did in my previous post by pointing out there nowhere (for either league) for St. Joe to go. This premise is all yours and UNdefined. I just tried to explain what few options your (latest) cryptic seemed to suggest for either league (none of which I suggest makes sense). Excuse me if the most obvious suggestions don't make sense to you. (1) Please explain what you meant by "replacement." In which league(s) were we to assume was to become home for the St. Joe franchise. an stj nol team would be just as isolated as kc is now .Have you EVER looked at a map? St. Joe is 53 miles from KCK! That's only only NINE miles further than the shortest distance between any of the closest teams in the entire history of the Northern League.
KCK is currently no closer than 501 miles from it's nearest NoL rival. That's nearly 10 times the distances. How is that "just as isolated?" Should Winnipeg feel about as "isolated" being over 200 miles from its nearest rival (and then 800+ from everyone else)? (2) Please explain this "isolation?" How would reducing the distance to the nearest club to nearly 1/10 and to less than an hour's drive be "just as isolated?" as for the nol being blocked by the fl as you say the windy city area clubs kick the behind of the fl clubs in attendanceThe FL is actively working to expand in Chicago -- the NoL isn't. The FL is expanding in the adjacent markets closeby and the NoL is completely absent. When they go up against the FL in Marion they fail. The NoL has some real serious competition and is losing out on the very places where they could expand. The Flyers, with 4,5000/gm can't make their utility payments (and possibly more financial shortfalls). Attendance is hardly any protection against anyone. Besides that, you just changing the subject, not denying their efforts. (3) Please tell us how "kick butt" attendance is helping the NoL with any expansion, especially in Chicago. Even if unsuccessful, how are the FL expansion efforts not a threat to NoL as it works to overlap further with the league? fl has not only shut the nol if you will out of eastern michigan but themselves as wellHow in the world is the FL blocking themselves out of Waterford (suburban Detroit) --where the NoL has been trying to get into for over 7 years? Is that not "eastern Michigan?" Even if Slippery Rock or Kalamazoo don't work out, neither would make it in the NoL. (4) Explain to us how "expansion = blocking." Explain why you choose to limit FL "self-blocking" to "eastern MI." Do you mean to suggest that having natural in-state rivals is going to prevent them from expansion in what is clearly eastern Michigan? There are four items marked above asking for explanation since the facts do not fit with your statements. They represent just a small sample of the problems your incomplete/incoherent/inconsistent posts have been for quite a long time. Please post answers in a way the rest of can easily understand. If they aren't just as confusing maybe you'll earn some respect.
Last Edited By: nlfan
26-Sep-07 10:54:17.
Edited 2 times.
|
|||
caretaker110 |
|||
|
Does every one need your expertice to participate on YOUR FORUM I think you need to take a time out or learn some conflect mediating Bill
|
|||
cra218 |
|||
|
the "nickname" that someone on this board gave me wasnt myself and if that someone on the board could understand that the nol has some real travel
issues it would help . as for fl expansion talk in chicago and detroit its just talk and caretaker110 someone on this board resorts to this behavior you speak
of due to arrogance not expertise . as for giving him a t/o or ignoring him in his quest to make the aa the greatest thing since sliced bread thats a good idea
!
|
|||
nlfan |
|||
|
Caretaker:
Sir, we've had this discussion a couple times before in the forums and by email. Again you're mistaking my taking someone to task for not lack of
clarity, consistency or coherency as "expertise." You may be inexperienced with online forums by I, crazi, and others are not. I think you'll
find that "attacks" on crazi by tearing apart his posts is hardly an insult. The "insult" is to the reader's intelligence. I
suggest you go to some other forums where you will find true name calling that has really alienated the audience.
I''ll repeat (again to you) that I ask that posts at least make sense. They don't have to be "correct," "expert," correctly spelled or even grammatically correct. Such standards are hardly "high," they're simply requesting some intelligence. And it's fine for newbies and others to ask questions about things they don't know --they won't get "hammered" like crazi (who should and acts as if he should know better). You'll find that other forums get distracted by real insults (overt, relentless or childish name calling) and in those forums they find presentation of fact "refreshing." I 'd also say it's those standards that have helped make these forums so popular and active --you're bound to learn something here. I'm tired of it and others are too. It's annoying and almost ranks as spam. I gave him a "time out" over the summer after a previous postfest of crazi-ness and let him back in--I could just as easily have permanently banned him. That shows patience and tolerance and crazi's testing it again. I'll add I think it's fairly safe to say crazi wants the attention and to post here. He knows at least I will read him and comment. Otherwise he'd have stuck to the BPD forums as he did during his time out. crazi
Nickname: Isn't your handle 133t 5p34k for "Crazy 8" (as I pointed out in the
forums some time ago)? Shortening it to crazi (not crazy) is hardly a crime especially if it helps to underscore the incoherency of your posts.
Travel issues: Don't insult our intelligence here. In these forums we're abundantly aware of that fact. And it hardly explains your latest posts. Just talk? Give us a break. In the past you've used "just talk" to make all sorts of things as "done deals" (like expansion to Saskatoon).
In this case, as I've made abundantly clear, the FL is doing the talking and the NoL is doing zip. If the league's going to expand it better do some talking because no one's going to just give them a new ballpark. Talking is how you get ballparks. Today BPD leads with the news they're talking to Champaign-Urbana. Where's the NoL in this? Nowhere. Back to your last posts, As usual, you ignored the bulk of the examples of your latest "crazi" behavior. Let's recap them and ask you to explain: 1. What sort of St. Joe/KC replacement were you talking about? Which leagues were involved? 2. How would having St. Joe in the same league with KCK keep "just as isolated?" 3. How does the FL's presence block itself from expansion in Michigan? How can that be true if they're working on getting into Waterford? If you can't explain yourself don't (ever) expect anyone to ever take you seriously. That's just plain crazi. |
|||
BarkeepND |
|||
don't (ever) expect anyone to ever take you seriously.i'm pretty sure that ship has sailed. |
|||
nlfan |
|||
|
Agreed Barkeep. Agreed.
|
|||
General Manager |
|||
nlfan wrote: Not to be a nitpick, but wasn't it Coach who with his "insider contacts" proclaimed Toon Town to be a done deal? |
|||
nlfan |
|||
|
I don't think so. If you search he's taken on crazi too.
crazi was the non-stop Toon Town cheerleader/dreamer here, here, here and here (looking for a expansion partner to go with them and naming a 10th team as part of the 2008 expansion or to replace a departing Calgary or just take a whirl in Saskatchewan). All with the premise an old, warn out ballpark could be made ready for the NoL. |
|||
cra218 |
|||
|
is saskatoon a done deal ? no
does cra218=crazy or crazi ? no where is the nl or in this case the fl on champaign / urbana ? unless beer sales are allowed NOWHERE has champaign / ubana ever had baseball recently ? yes and it folded along with the rest of the great central league back in 1994 as for sailing ships i can think of some that left the drain plug out and im not speaking of crazy , crazi or whatever else someone would like to label me |
|||
nlfan |
|||
|
Above I never said you said it was a done deal. We agree on that.
But you have brought them up time and time again: cra21/crazi said:Got a clue now why people might be confused? Of why there a many of us are tired of it? I already replied to your latest round of errors and miscues regarding the FL, Marion and Champaign-Urbana in that topic. You still haven't explained the three items I clearly listed above. Could it be because you can't defend/explain them? |
|||
goldeyesalltheway |
|||
|
If St Joe Folds, KC natural replacement for AA???????? |
|||
cra218 |
|||
|
did someone say something ?
Last Edited By: cra218
27-Sep-07 11:10:09.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
kckman |
|||
|
For the record, O.P. has no stadium, and has no plans for building a stadium. In fact, there has been no discussion in the local fishwraps (the Kansas City
Star and the Overland Park Sun) nor on local blogs even suggesting anyone is
looking into such prospects. Overland Park just turned down a bond issue to build a new soccer stadium and allow the Kansas City Wizards to move there;
it's unlikely they'd vote to build a baseball park for professional use either, and there is no talk of any private interest wanting to build here. In
short, Overland Park as a NL/FL/AA expansion prospect is strictly fantasy at this time and for the foreseeable future.
Olathe, KS (pop. ~100K) attempted to land an expansion FL franchise between the 2002/2003 seasons, but could not get local financing for a stadium; when KCK landed a team in the NL, all talk of a team in Olathe died quickly afterward; it's been suggested since that the proximity of Olathe and KCK (~25 miles) would kill one or both teams should one be placed there. Lee's Summit, MO (pop. ~80K, and at the opposite corner of the metro area) has been mentioned a few times as a possible location for a team (usually FL), but they still have no plans for a new ballpark. The existing one is used by the local community college and is substandard for professional use. It does not appear at present that the Kansas City area will support a second indy team, and it is clear that KCK will not join the AA as long as the Ehlerts are at the helm. |
|||
mcarlsonus |
Better late than never?? BUT, back on topic... | ||
|
Olathe, yeah, probably dead in the water. However, it was my understanding they were trying to grab an affiliate when they were "grabbing;" not
another indy league team.
Lee's Summit: "kck's" right: believe that's also been forgotten. The original plan was to use a community college ballyard for the (probably FL) team, but that would have lots of issues outside of simply ballpark "adequacy." For example, I believe the taxpayers might have something to say about being asked to support a for-profit concern. And, serving beer, etc.? Hmmm... Back to "kck's" comment as to Overland Park. The soccer complex was soundly defeated, but my overall feeling was that it was so "over the top" (or, Overland Park-style hubris), it deserved to die. Second reason there'll never be a ballpark in Overland Park: land prices. The place is heavily-business oriented, tremendously expensive real estate compared to the rest of the area and, barring Olathe, they're now landlocked. They've already consumed the southern portions of their domain (Stanley, Stilwel), but now have nowhere else to go. Using land for that purpose wouldn't be financially prudent. And, finally, would anyone want to take on the nearby juggernaut, the Kansas City T-Bones? Depends on what part of Overland Park one is in but, on average, it's a 20-minute commute down I-435 to the T's home. |
|||